Picture days cancelled after former owner of US school photography company named in Epstein files
Districts in New Jersey, Arizona and California review Lifetouch over past Apollo–Epstein links
School districts across the United States have launched investigations into Lifetouch and, in some cases, cancelled school picture days following unsubstantiated online rumours linking the company to Jeffrey Epstein.
The controversy centres on Lifetouch’s former indirect ownership through Apollo Global Management, previously led by billionaire Leon Black, who had documented financial ties to Epstein. Several districts confirmed this week that they are reviewing their relationship with the photography provider.
Clifton Public Schools in New Jersey told parents, “At this time, no evidence has been presented indicating misconduct involving Lifetouch’s operations within our schools or any compromise of student information. Nevertheless, we believe it is appropriate to review the matter carefully and transparently.”
In Arizona, Prescott Valley Charter School said it was cancelling scheduled photo sessions “out of an abundance of caution”, adding, “While we do not have any information indicating a direct impact on our school or our students, our highest responsibility is always the safety, security, and trust of our families.”
Rumours circulating online suggest that children’s photographs may have been accessed by individuals named in the Epstein files. Although Lifetouch’s name appears in a 2019 bank statement connected to the Epstein death investigation, there is no evidence linking the company to misconduct.
Lifetouch has denied any wrongdoing. A spokesperson said the “claims are completely false” and stated: “When Lifetouch photographers take your student’s picture, that image is safeguarded for families and schools, only, with no exceptions.”
Chief executive Ken Murphy also stressed that “no past or present member of Apollo’s Board of Directors or Apollo’s investors have ever had access to student images, for any purpose.” The company said it complies with federal and state privacy laws, including the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.
Despite the assurances, some parents have called for greater transparency and consideration of local photography providers as investigations continue.
